Hi,
On 2/15/06, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can however deduce the need for a file in the top-level directory
> containing something like ``If you want to work on the Mach kernel's core
> or system dependent parts or ..., be sure to reset your CVS checkout to
> the revision `gnumach-1-branch-before-...' and have a look at the files
> in i386/pc/, ...''.
I agree with this. There is *lot* of useful code
if-that-would-be-updated-and-we-d-actually-need-it, but unfortunately
at the moment we don't need it. Think about partition support (which
actually needs one or two lines hack to be updated and working): it's
cool, but we don't need it. Having a minimal tree it's our higher
priority need at the moment.
G.
--
It was a type of people I did not know, I found them very strange and
they did not inspire confidence at all. Later I learned that I had been
introduced to electronic engineers.
E. W. Dijkstra
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
