bind-users  

Messages by Date

• 2022/11/14 Re: How to *require* TSIG for NOTIFY Jesus Cea
• 2022/11/14 Re: How to *require* TSIG for NOTIFY Mark Andrews
• 2022/11/14 How to *require* TSIG for NOTIFY Jesus Cea
• 2022/11/14 Re: CH/TXT/VERSION.SERVER queries Ondřej Surý
• 2022/11/14 CH/TXT/VERSION.SERVER queries Anand Buddhdev
• 2022/11/14 Re: Deprecating auto-dnssec and inline-signing in 9.18+ Matthijs Mekking
• 2022/11/12 回复: failed to start BIND 9.16.34 on Ubuntu 20.04 Ling Yun
• 2022/11/12 Re: failed to start BIND 9.16.34 on Ubuntu 20.04 Ondřej Surý
• 2022/11/12 Re: Re: failed to start BIND 9.16.34 on Ubuntu 20.04 Ling Yun
• 2022/11/11 Re: 回复: failed to start BIND 9.16.34 on Ubuntu 20.04 Benny Pedersen
• 2022/11/11 回复: failed to start BIND 9.16.34 on Ubuntu 20.04 Ling Yun
• 2022/11/11 Re: failed to start BIND 9.16.34 on Ubuntu 20.04 Tom Krizek
• 2022/11/10 failed to start BIND 9.16.34 on Ubuntu 20.04 Ling Yun
• 2022/11/10 Re: 'inline-signing' might go away and be replaced by dnssec-policy ? Matthijs Mekking
• 2022/11/09 Re: 'inline-signing' might go away and be replaced by dnssec-policy ? Tom
• 2022/11/08 Re: How to introduce automatic signing for existing signed zones? Niall O'Reilly
• 2022/11/07 Re: How to introduce automatic signing for existing signed zones? Matthijs Mekking
• 2022/11/07 Re: How to introduce automatic signing for existing signed zones? Niall O'Reilly
• 2022/11/07 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Fred Morris
• 2022/11/07 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/11/07 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/11/07 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Fred Morris
• 2022/11/07 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Fred Morris
• 2022/11/07 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/11/07 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/11/07 RE: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. David Carvalho via bind-users
• 2022/11/07 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Ondřej Surý
• 2022/11/07 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/11/07 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Ondřej Surý
• 2022/11/07 Re: How to introduce automatic signing for existing signed zones? Niall O'Reilly
• 2022/11/07 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/11/07 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Petr Špaček
• 2022/11/07 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/11/07 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Petr Špaček
• 2022/11/07 Re: How to introduce automatic signing for existing signed zones? Matthijs Mekking
• 2022/11/07 Re: How to introduce automatic signing for existing signed zones? Matthijs Mekking
• 2022/11/07 How to introduce automatic signing for existing signed zones? Niall O'Reilly
• 2022/11/07 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/11/07 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/11/07 Re: Unexpected extra care needed for building BIND 9.18.8 Niall O'Reilly
• 2022/11/06 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/11/06 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/11/06 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Carl Byington via bind-users
• 2022/11/06 Re: Unexpected extra care needed for building BIND 9.18.8 Ondřej Surý
• 2022/11/06 Unexpected extra care needed for building BIND 9.18.8 Niall O'Reilly
• 2022/11/06 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/11/05 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/11/05 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Ondřej Surý
• 2022/11/05 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. David Alexandre M. de Carvalho via bind-users
• 2022/11/04 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/11/04 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/11/04 doc Randy Bush
• 2022/11/04 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Mark Andrews
• 2022/11/04 RE: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Cuttler, Brian R (HEALTH) via bind-users
• 2022/11/04 RE: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Cuttler, Brian R (HEALTH) via bind-users
• 2022/11/04 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/11/04 RE: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. David Carvalho via bind-users
• 2022/11/04 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/11/04 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Fred Morris
• 2022/11/04 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Lyle Giese
• 2022/11/04 RE: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. David Carvalho via bind-users
• 2022/11/04 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/11/04 RE: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Fred Morris
• 2022/11/04 RE: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. David Carvalho via bind-users
• 2022/11/04 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Fred Morris
• 2022/11/04 Re: Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/11/04 Reverse lookups not working when Internet connection failed. David Carvalho via bind-users
• 2022/11/01 BIND DNS Server named.conf and chroot error after upgrading Virtualmin Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
• 2022/11/01 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Petr Menšík
• 2022/10/31 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Ondřej Surý
• 2022/10/31 Re: Classless reverse zones CNAME and PTR resolution issue Mark Andrews
• 2022/10/31 Re: Classless reverse zones CNAME and PTR resolution issue Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/10/31 Classless reverse zones CNAME and PTR resolution issue Nagesh Thati
• 2022/10/29 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Bjørn Mork
• 2022/10/28 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Nick Tait via bind-users
• 2022/10/28 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Havard Eidnes via bind-users
• 2022/10/28 Re: many log messages with 'already have ede' etc ? Kurt Jaeger
• 2022/10/28 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Ondřej Surý
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Bjørn Mork
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Mark Andrews
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Paul Ebersman
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Andrew Latham
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Marco
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Tom
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Marco
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/10/27 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Greg Choules via bind-users
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Bjørn Mork
• 2022/10/27 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Bob McDonald
• 2022/10/27 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Petr Špaček
• 2022/10/27 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Veronique Lefebure
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Havard Eidnes via bind-users
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Havard Eidnes via bind-users
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Michael Richardson
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Havard Eidnes via bind-users
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Marco
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Bjørn Mork
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/10/27 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/10/27 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Greg Choules via bind-users
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones Marco
• 2022/10/27 Re: new dnssec zone OK, error "zone_rekey:dns_zone_getdnsseckeys failed: not found" only in local bind logs ? Matthijs Mekking
• 2022/10/27 Re: automatic reverse and forwarding zones JAHANZAIB SYED
• 2022/10/27 automatic reverse and forwarding zones Marco Moock
• 2022/10/27 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Veronique Lefebure
• 2022/10/26 Re: many log messages with 'already have ede' etc ? Mark Andrews
• 2022/10/26 Re: 'inline-signing' might go away and be replaced by dnssec-policy ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/26 Re: 'inline-signing' might go away and be replaced by dnssec-policy ? Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users
• 2022/10/26 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Ondřej Surý
• 2022/10/26 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users
• 2022/10/26 many log messages with 'already have ede' etc ? Kurt Jaeger
• 2022/10/26 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Greg Choules via bind-users
• 2022/10/26 RE: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Bob McDonald
• 2022/10/26 Re: new dnssec zone OK, error "zone_rekey:dns_zone_getdnsseckeys failed: not found" only in local bind logs ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/26 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Andrew Latham
• 2022/10/26 Re: 'inline-signing' might go away and be replaced by dnssec-policy ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/26 Re: 'inline-signing' might go away and be replaced by dnssec-policy ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/26 Re: 'inline-signing' might go away and be replaced by dnssec-policy ? Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users
• 2022/10/26 Re: A beginner's guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9 Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users
• 2022/10/26 Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Ondřej Surý
• 2022/10/26 dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33 Veronique Lefebure
• 2022/10/26 Re: 'inline-signing' might go away and be replaced by dnssec-policy ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/26 Re: 'inline-signing' might go away and be replaced by dnssec-policy ? Mark Elkins via bind-users
• 2022/10/26 Re: 'inline-signing' might go away and be replaced by dnssec-policy ? Tom
• 2022/10/26 Re: A beginner's guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9 Matthijs Mekking
• 2022/10/26 Re: 'inline-signing' might go away and be replaced by dnssec-policy ? Matthijs Mekking
• 2022/10/26 Re: after DS RECORD publish/verify, DSStatus stuck @ "rumoured" after manual `rndc dnssec -checkds` update ? Matthijs Mekking
• 2022/10/25 Re: queries for just a few domains fail (NXDOMAIN) for a bind 9.18 non-forwarding config ; forwarding does fix it. problem with 'my' config, or 'their' DNS ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/25 Re: queries for just a few domains fail (NXDOMAIN) for a bind 9.18 non-forwarding config ; forwarding does fix it. problem with 'my' config, or 'their' DNS ? Mark Andrews
• 2022/10/25 Re: A beginner's guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9 PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/25 Re: queries for just a few domains fail (NXDOMAIN) for a bind 9.18 non-forwarding config ; forwarding does fix it. problem with 'my' config, or 'their' DNS ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/25 Re: queries for just a few domains fail (NXDOMAIN) for a bind 9.18 non-forwarding config ; forwarding does fix it. problem with 'my' config, or 'their' DNS ? Mark Andrews
• 2022/10/25 Re: queries for just a few domains fail (NXDOMAIN) for a bind 9.18 non-forwarding config ; forwarding does fix it. problem with 'my' config, or 'their' DNS ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/25 Re: queries for just a few domains fail (NXDOMAIN) for a bind 9.18 non-forwarding config ; forwarding does fix it. problem with 'my' config, or 'their' DNS ? Mark Andrews
• 2022/10/25 queries for just a few domains fail (NXDOMAIN) for a bind 9.18 non-forwarding config ; forwarding does fix it. problem with 'my' config, or 'their' DNS ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/24 RE: A beginner's guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9 Richard T.A. Neal
• 2022/10/24 'inline-signing' might go away and be replaced by dnssec-policy ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/24 Re: A beginner's guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9 Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users
• 2022/10/24 Re: after DS RECORD publish/verify, DSStatus stuck @ "rumoured" after manual `rndc dnssec -checkds` update ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/24 Re: after DS RECORD publish/verify, DSStatus stuck @ "rumoured" after manual `rndc dnssec -checkds` update ? Matthijs Mekking
• 2022/10/23 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Sandro
• 2022/10/22 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Crist Clark
• 2022/10/22 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Sandro
• 2022/10/21 Re: after DS RECORD publish/verify, DSStatus stuck @ "rumoured" after manual `rndc dnssec -checkds` update ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/21 after DS RECORD publish/verify, DSStatus stuck @ "rumoured" after manual `rndc dnssec -checkds` update ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/21 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Ondřej Surý
• 2022/10/21 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Andreas S. Kerber
• 2022/10/21 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Anand Buddhdev
• 2022/10/21 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Hugo Salgado
• 2022/10/21 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Borja Marcos
• 2022/10/21 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Ondřej Surý
• 2022/10/21 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Borja Marcos
• 2022/10/20 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Mark Andrews
• 2022/10/20 Re: procedure for re-signing zones on nsec3param change, when using dnssec-policy full automation? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/20 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Ondřej Surý
• 2022/10/20 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Andreas S. Kerber
• 2022/10/20 Re: FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Ondřej Surý
• 2022/10/20 FORMERR responses after upgrading resolver from 9.16 to 9.18.8 Andreas S. Kerber
• 2022/10/20 Re: procedure for re-signing zones on nsec3param change, when using dnssec-policy full automation? Petr Špaček
• 2022/10/19 Re: procedure for re-signing zones on nsec3param change, when using dnssec-policy full automation? Mark Andrews
• 2022/10/19 procedure for re-signing zones on nsec3param change, when using dnssec-policy full automation? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/19 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/10/19 Re: CVE-2022-2795 Greg Choules via bind-users
• 2022/10/19 Secondary zone is only using the first listed primary Nick Tait via bind-users
• 2022/10/18 CVE-2022-2795 Greg Rabil
• 2022/10/18 Re: secure/tls access for statistics-channels ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/18 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Bob McDonald
• 2022/10/18 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Petr Špaček
• 2022/10/18 Re: secure/tls access for statistics-channels ? Petr Špaček
• 2022/10/17 A beginner's guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9 Richard T.A. Neal
• 2022/10/17 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/10/16 Re: new dnssec zone OK, error "zone_rekey:dns_zone_getdnsseckeys failed: not found" only in local bind logs ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/16 Re: new dnssec zone OK, error "zone_rekey:dns_zone_getdnsseckeys failed: not found" only in local bind logs ? Mark Andrews
• 2022/10/16 Re: new dnssec zone OK, error "zone_rekey:dns_zone_getdnsseckeys failed: not found" only in local bind logs ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/15 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/10/15 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Bob McDonald
• 2022/10/15 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Greg Choules via bind-users
• 2022/10/15 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Fred Morris
• 2022/10/15 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/10/15 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/10/15 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Grant Taylor via bind-users
• 2022/10/15 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/10/15 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Bob McDonald
• 2022/10/15 Re: bind 9.18.7, fbsd13.1: crash with signed/signing zone Kurt Jaeger
• 2022/10/15 bind 9.18.7, fbsd13.1: crash with signed/signing zone Kurt Jaeger
• 2022/10/14 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2022/10/14 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers JW λ John Woodworth
• 2022/10/14 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Greg Choules via bind-users
• 2022/10/14 RE: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers JW λ John Woodworth
• 2022/10/14 Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Greg Choules via bind-users
• 2022/10/14 Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers Bob McDonald
• 2022/10/14 secure/tls access for statistics-channels ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/14 Re: new dnssec zone OK, error "zone_rekey:dns_zone_getdnsseckeys failed: not found" only in local bind logs ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/14 Re: new dnssec zone OK, error "zone_rekey:dns_zone_getdnsseckeys failed: not found" only in local bind logs ? Matthijs Mekking
• 2022/10/14 Re: new dnssec zone OK, error "zone_rekey:dns_zone_getdnsseckeys failed: not found" only in local bind logs ? PGNet Dev
• 2022/10/14 Re: new dnssec zone OK, error "zone_rekey:dns_zone_getdnsseckeys failed: not found" only in local bind logs ? Ondřej Surý

• Later messages