Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Oh, sorry, I totally forgot about running the 2.2 branch regression tests. I
> always run regressions from the trunk. There only once or twice I all of
> Bacula history did we have incompatible regression tests from the old branch
> and the trunk.
>
> I'll update the 2.2 branch regress so that it is current with the trunk in
> the
> next few hours. In the mean time, I suggest that you use Branch-2.2 source,
> but the trunk regression scripts ...
Ah, okay.
In that case, I ran the trunk regression tests against the 2.2 branch on
Fedora 8. Everything passed except these tests:
!!!!! maxvol-test failed!!! 10:55:57 !!!!!
!!!!! maxvol2-test failed!!! 10:58:34 !!!!!
!!!!! migration-job-test failed!!! 11:04:56 !!!!!
!!!!! migration-jobspan-test failed!!! 11:05:48 !!!!!
!!!!! migration-volume-test failed!!! 11:06:42 !!!!!
!!!!! migration-time-test failed!!! 11:07:54 !!!!!
Let me know if you'd like me to get more debugging information on any of these
tests.
--
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu | For every problem, there is a solution that
WPI Senior Network Engineer | is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken
GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4 E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
