Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would appreciate it if all the beta testers would test the current
> Branch-2.2. against the regression scripts. The two maxvol tests are
> expected to fail.
Just to double check, should we be testing /branches/Branch-2.2/bacula against
/branches/Branch-2.2/regress or /trunk/regress ? And if the former, it just
needs a quick patch to configure and compile correctly
Index: scripts/regress-config
===================================================================
--- scripts/regress-config (revision 6092)
+++ scripts/regress-config (working copy)
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
CFLAGS="-g -O2 -Wall" \
./configure \
--sbindir=${1}/bin \
- --archivedir=${1}/tmp \
+ --with-archivedir=${1}/tmp \
--sysconfdir=${1}/bin \
--mandir=${1}/bin \
--with-pid-dir=${1}/working \
--
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu | For every problem, there is a solution that
WPI Senior Network Engineer | is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken
GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4 E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
