On Saturday 22 December 2007 15:37, Frank Sweetser wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would appreciate it if all the beta testers would test the current
> > Branch-2.2. against the regression scripts. The two maxvol tests are
> > expected to fail.
>
> Just to double check, should we be testing /branches/Branch-2.2/bacula
> against /branches/Branch-2.2/regress or /trunk/regress ? And if the
> former, it just needs a quick patch to configure and compile correctly
That patch is already included in the 2.2 Branch so the regression scripts
should work fine either on the branch source or the trunk source, with the
exception that the branch still gets errors running the maxvol and maxvol2
tests. There may also be some problems with weird-files2 ...
Thanks for the quick action.
Kern
>
> Index: scripts/regress-config
> ===================================================================
> --- scripts/regress-config (revision 6092)
> +++ scripts/regress-config (working copy)
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
> CFLAGS="-g -O2 -Wall" \
> ./configure \
> --sbindir=${1}/bin \
> - --archivedir=${1}/tmp \
> + --with-archivedir=${1}/tmp \
> --sysconfdir=${1}/bin \
> --mandir=${1}/bin \
> --with-pid-dir=${1}/working \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
