Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Saturday 22 December 2007 15:37, Frank Sweetser wrote: >> Kern Sibbald wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would appreciate it if all the beta testers would test the current >>> Branch-2.2. against the regression scripts. The two maxvol tests are >>> expected to fail. >> Just to double check, should we be testing /branches/Branch-2.2/bacula >> against /branches/Branch-2.2/regress or /trunk/regress ? And if the >> former, it just needs a quick patch to configure and compile correctly > > That patch is already included in the 2.2 Branch so the regression scripts
You may want to double check that that particular commit made it, as sourceforge has a different opinion. http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bacula/branches/Branch-2.2/regress/scripts/regress-config?revision=5720&view=markup shows configure still being called with '--archivedir'. -- Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu | For every problem, there is a solution that WPI Senior Network Engineer | is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4 E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
