Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict? (Was: grep -E)

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Aug 31, 2000, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It's obvious from the definition of AC_TRY_CPP that warnings in
> headers are not tolerated.

> It remains an open question whether Autoconf should be so strict.

It must.  There are compilers that don't return a failure status when
asked to #include a non-existent file.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me