On Aug 29, 2000, "Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 29 Aug 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Aug 29, 2000, Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > AFAIK '^ *+' is a regular expression and not an extended regular >> > expression. >> >> `+' after `*' isn't portable, IIRC. In fact, I don't understand what >> we're trying to accomplish with that construct. It makes no sense at >> all to me. > The `*' is the metacharacter: `+' is literal. `+' isn't a portable literal. Some implementations seem to use it as a meta-character with the usual meaning, but without support for it after `*'. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Pavel Roskin
- AC_TRY_CPP too strict? (Wa... Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict?... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict?... Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict?... Thomas Dickey
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict?... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem sol... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Thomas Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem solved) Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem sol... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem... Pavel Roskin