On 29 Aug 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > The `*' is the metacharacter: `+' is literal. > > `+' isn't a portable literal. Some implementations seem to use it as > a meta-character with the usual meaning, but without support for it > after `*'. unless I missed a response, so far all that's been demonstrated is that a newer version of GNU grep doesn't behave the same as other versions of grep. It's probably a bug rather than a feature (bear in mind that GNU grep has to keep track of whether it's supposed to be fgrep, grep or egrep -- in the latter case, `+' would be a metacharacter). -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Pavel Roskin
- AC_TRY_CPP too strict? (Wa... Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict?... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict?... Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict?... Thomas Dickey
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict?... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem sol... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Thomas Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem solved) Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem sol... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Alexandre Oliva