On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Earnie Boyd wrote: > But is egrep portable? Is the grep in question here GNU grep? AFAIK '^ *+' is > a regular expression and not an extended regular expression. that's my impression (from reading the description yesterday). -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
- grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem solved) OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem sol... Lars Hecking
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem sol... Earnie Boyd
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Lars Hecking
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Co... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Co... Pavel Roskin
- AC_TRY_CPP too str... Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too... Pavel Roskin