Alexandre Oliva writes: > On Aug 29, 2000, Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > AFAIK '^ *+' is a regular expression and not an extended regular > > expression. > > `+' after `*' isn't portable, IIRC. In fact, I don't understand what > we're trying to accomplish with that construct. It makes no sense at > all to me. That's what I wrote to Earnie. To match a literal plus sign, it needs to be escaped.
- grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem solved) OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem sol... Lars Hecking
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem sol... Earnie Boyd
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Lars Hecking
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Co... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Co... Pavel Roskin
- AC_TRY_CPP too str... Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too... Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too... Thomas Dickey
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too... Alexandre Oliva