On 29 Aug 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Aug 29, 2000, Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > AFAIK '^ *+' is a regular expression and not an extended regular > > expression. > > `+' after `*' isn't portable, IIRC. In fact, I don't understand what > we're trying to accomplish with that construct. It makes no sense at > all to me. The `*' is the metacharacter: `+' is literal. -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Pavel Roskin
- AC_TRY_CPP too strict? (Wa... Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict?... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict?... Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict?... Thomas Dickey
- Re: AC_TRY_CPP too strict?... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem sol... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Thomas Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compil... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem solved) Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem sol... Alexandre Oliva