Arnt, Bron, The sections in RFC-to-be 9755 are ordered per RFC 7322 [1], where Acknowledgments and Contributors (if present) are unnumbered and appear directly before the "Authors' Addresses" section.
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7322.html#section-4 Thank you. RFC Editor/ar > On Feb 21, 2025, at 8:10 AM, Bron Gondwana <br...@fastmailteam.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, at 13:08, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: >> Alice Russo writes: >> > Authors, >> > We await your replies to the following questions, as well as >> > any further changes, for this document >> > (https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755.html and .txt and >> > .pdf). This diff shows all changes from the Internet-Draft: >> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755-rfcdiff.html >> >> I'm happy, of course. >> >> One tiny point that I noticed while rereading: There now is a section >> titled "acknowledgements" after one whose title starts with "appendix", I >> suppose I was careless while I copied text from 6855. I think most RFCs >> have the acks just before the references, right? Perhaps it's best to move >> it up to be in the usual location. > > This seems fine to me, re-ordering sections to be the "normal" way with > appendix at the end is an entirely editorial choice that doesn't change the > meaning. > > Bron. > > -- > Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd > br...@fastmailteam.com > > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org