Arnt, Bron,

The sections in RFC-to-be 9755 are ordered per RFC 7322 [1], where 
Acknowledgments and Contributors (if present) are unnumbered and appear 
directly before the "Authors' Addresses" section.

[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7322.html#section-4

Thank you.
RFC Editor/ar

> On Feb 21, 2025, at 8:10 AM, Bron Gondwana <br...@fastmailteam.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, at 13:08, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
>> Alice Russo writes:
>> > Authors,
>> > We await your replies to the following questions, as well as 
>> > any further changes, for this document 
>> > (https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755.html and .txt and 
>> > .pdf). This diff shows all changes from the Internet-Draft:
>> >   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755-rfcdiff.html
>> 
>> I'm happy, of course.
>> 
>> One tiny point that I noticed while rereading: There now is a section 
>> titled "acknowledgements" after one whose title starts with "appendix", I 
>> suppose I was careless while I copied text from 6855. I think most RFCs 
>> have the acks just before the references, right? Perhaps it's best to move 
>> it up to be in the usual location.
> 
> This seems fine to me, re-ordering sections to be the "normal" way with 
> appendix at the end is an entirely editorial choice that doesn't change the 
> meaning.
> 
> Bron.
> 
> --
>   Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
>   br...@fastmailteam.com
> 
> 

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to