On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, at 13:08, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > Alice Russo writes: > > Authors, > > We await your replies to the following questions, as well as > > any further changes, for this document > > (https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755.html and .txt and > > .pdf). This diff shows all changes from the Internet-Draft: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755-rfcdiff.html > > I'm happy, of course. > > One tiny point that I noticed while rereading: There now is a section > titled "acknowledgements" after one whose title starts with "appendix", I > suppose I was careless while I copied text from 6855. I think most RFCs > have the acks just before the references, right? Perhaps it's best to move > it up to be in the usual location.
This seems fine to me, re-ordering sections to be the "normal" way with appendix at the end is an entirely editorial choice that doesn't change the meaning. Bron. -- Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd br...@fastmailteam.com
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
