On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, at 16:59, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 3:01 PM Alice Russo <aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > wrote: >> Murray (as AD), >> >> Re: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755.html >> >> Would you please offer guidance on whether to add the "Note that when" >> paragraph in Section 7 (pasted below)? My understanding is that we do not >> have consensus among the authors on whether to add it (specificially, the >> authors are 1 in favor, 1 against, and 1 OK either way). The WG chair (Bron) >> wrote "no strong preference either way". > > If this is the aggregate position, I'm inclined to suggest one of two things: > > (a) Do not make the change. > > (b) Put the question to the working group (say, for a week) and have the > chairs call consensus on the result of that discussion. If the consensus > answer to that question is ambiguous, default to (a).
I vote for (a) Do not make the change. It's already been discussed in the working group for over a week and the working group is generally unhappy with the change as far as I can see. So let's go ahead with it as-is and not add the text. I think it's clear enough without it. Bron. -- Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd br...@fastmailteam.com
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
