OK, then Alice, please proceed without the new text. -MSK, ART AD
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 9:20 AM Bron Gondwana <br...@fastmailteam.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, at 16:59, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 3:01 PM Alice Russo <aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > Murray (as AD), > > Re: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755.html > > Would you please offer guidance on whether to add the "Note that when" > paragraph in Section 7 (pasted below)? My understanding is that we do not > have consensus among the authors on whether to add it (specificially, the > authors are 1 in favor, 1 against, and 1 OK either way). The WG chair > (Bron) wrote "no strong preference either way". > > > If this is the aggregate position, I'm inclined to suggest one of two > things: > > (a) Do not make the change. > > (b) Put the question to the working group (say, for a week) and have the > chairs call consensus on the result of that discussion. If the consensus > answer to that question is ambiguous, default to (a). > > > I vote for (a) Do not make the change. It's already been discussed in the > working group for over a week and the working group is generally unhappy > with the change as far as I can see. > > So let's go ahead with it as-is and not add the text. I think it's clear > enough without it. > > Bron. > > -- > Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd > br...@fastmailteam.com > > >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
