All, Thank you for your reviews. We have received all of the needed approvals and will continue with publication shortly.
Thank you, RFC Editor/sg > On Feb 20, 2025, at 1:09 AM, Benoit Claise <benoit.cla...@huawei.com> wrote: > > Thank you Sabrina and Sandy, > > All looks good to me. > > Regards, Benoit > > > On 2/19/2025 11:00 PM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT wrote: >> Hi Sandy, Paul, all, >> >> We've updated the registry to reflect the changes in the diff and fixed the >> typos, as noted by Paul (thank you for pointing these out): >> >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix >> >> Let us know if any other changes are needed. >> >> Thanks, >> Sabrina >> >> On Wed Feb 19 19:48:34 2025, sgin...@staff.rfc-editor.org wrote: >>> Hi Paul, Sabrina, Authors, >>> >>> I removed the two instances of '(previously the "X" registry)’. I >>> also changed the citation tags for [RFC768] and [RFC791] (removed the >>> leading zeros). >>> >>> >>>> Also, RFC9710 is not listed in the "Reference" column for any of the >>>> changes. Whether that's an oversight in the RFC, or an expectation >>>> that IANA will automatically add it; I believe it should be listed >>>> against each modified element. >>> Rather than add a reference for each entry, I added a statement in >>> section 9. Please review and let us know if this addresses your >>> concern. Thank you for pointing out - we missed adding mention of >>> this change. >>> >>> The current files are here: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710.xml >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710.txt >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710.pdf >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710.html >>> >>> Diffs highlighting only the updates described above: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-lastdiff.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-lastrfcdiff.html (side by >>> side) >>> >>> AUTH48 diffs: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-auth48diff.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-auth48rfcdiff.html (side >>> by side) >>> >>> Comprehensive diffs: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-diff.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-rfcdiff.html (side by >>> side) >>> >>> >>> Please review and let us know if any further updates are needed. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> RFC Editor/sg >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Feb 19, 2025, at 6:56 AM, Aitken, Paul <pait...@ciena.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Sabrina, there are still some discrepancies between the RFC-to-be and >>>> the registry. I've checked sections 4, 5, and 7 of the RFC-to-be, but >>>> not yet section 6. >>>> >>>> Also, RFC9710 is not listed in the "Reference" column for any of the >>>> changes. Whether that's an oversight in the RFC, or an expectation >>>> that IANA will automatically add it; I believe it should be listed >>>> against each modified element. >>>> >>>> >>>> 4.1.2. NEW / sourceTransportPort >>>> 4.2.2. NEW / destinationTransportPort >>>> 4.4.2. NEW / collectorTransportPort >>>> 4.5.2. NEW / exporterTransportPort >>>> The RFC says "See [RFC0768]" while the registry says "See [RFC768]". >>>> >>>> 262 messageMD5Checksum >>>> >>>> "messageScope Information lement" should be "messageScope Information >>>> Element" >>>> >>>> 285 anonymizationFlags >>>> >>>> The text is correct, but the right-hand edge of the table is wonky. >>>> >>>> 340 informationElementDescription >>>> >>>> "with its ownlanguage tag" should be "with its own language tag". >>>> >>>> >>>> P. > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
