Hi Paul, Sabrina, Authors, I removed the two instances of '(previously the "X" registry)’. I also changed the citation tags for [RFC768] and [RFC791] (removed the leading zeros).
> Also, RFC9710 is not listed in the "Reference" column for any of the changes. > Whether that's an oversight in the RFC, or an expectation that IANA will > automatically add it; I believe it should be listed against each modified > element. Rather than add a reference for each entry, I added a statement in section 9. Please review and let us know if this addresses your concern. Thank you for pointing out - we missed adding mention of this change. The current files are here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710.html Diffs highlighting only the updates described above: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-lastdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) AUTH48 diffs: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) Comprehensive diffs: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-rfcdiff.html (side by side) Please review and let us know if any further updates are needed. Thank you, RFC Editor/sg > On Feb 19, 2025, at 6:56 AM, Aitken, Paul <pait...@ciena.com> wrote: > > Sabrina, there are still some discrepancies between the RFC-to-be and the > registry. I've checked sections 4, 5, and 7 of the RFC-to-be, but not yet > section 6. > > Also, RFC9710 is not listed in the "Reference" column for any of the changes. > Whether that's an oversight in the RFC, or an expectation that IANA will > automatically add it; I believe it should be listed against each modified > element. > > > 4.1.2. NEW / sourceTransportPort > 4.2.2. NEW / destinationTransportPort > 4.4.2. NEW / collectorTransportPort > 4.5.2. NEW / exporterTransportPort > The RFC says "See [RFC0768]" while the registry says "See [RFC768]". > > 262 messageMD5Checksum > > "messageScope Information lement" should be "messageScope Information Element" > > 285 anonymizationFlags > > The text is correct, but the right-hand edge of the table is wonky. > > 340 informationElementDescription > > "with its ownlanguage tag" should be "with its own language tag". > > > P. -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
