Sabrina, there are still some discrepancies between the RFC-to-be and the registry. I've checked sections 4, 5, and 7 of the RFC-to-be, but not yet section 6.
Also, RFC9710 is not listed in the "Reference" column for any of the changes. Whether that's an oversight in the RFC, or an expectation that IANA will automatically add it; I believe it should be listed against each modified element. 4.1.2. NEW / sourceTransportPort 4.2.2. NEW / destinationTransportPort 4.4.2. NEW / collectorTransportPort 4.5.2. NEW / exporterTransportPort The RFC says "See [RFC0768]" while the registry says "See [RFC768]". 262 messageMD5Checksum "messageScope Information lement" should be "messageScope Information Element" 285 anonymizationFlags The text is correct, but the right-hand edge of the table is wonky. 340 informationElementDescription "with its ownlanguage tag" should be "with its own language tag". P.
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
