Thank you Sabrina and Sandy,
All looks good to me.
Regards, Benoit
On 2/19/2025 11:00 PM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT wrote:
Hi Sandy, Paul, all,
We've updated the registry to reflect the changes in the diff and fixed the
typos, as noted by Paul (thank you for pointing these out):
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix
Let us know if any other changes are needed.
Thanks,
Sabrina
On Wed Feb 19 19:48:34 2025, sgin...@staff.rfc-editor.org wrote:
Hi Paul, Sabrina, Authors,
I removed the two instances of '(previously the "X" registry)’. I
also changed the citation tags for [RFC768] and [RFC791] (removed the
leading zeros).
Also, RFC9710 is not listed in the "Reference" column for any of the
changes. Whether that's an oversight in the RFC, or an expectation
that IANA will automatically add it; I believe it should be listed
against each modified element.
Rather than add a reference for each entry, I added a statement in
section 9. Please review and let us know if this addresses your
concern. Thank you for pointing out - we missed adding mention of
this change.
The current files are here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710.xml
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710.txt
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710.pdf
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710.html
Diffs highlighting only the updates described above:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-lastdiff.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-lastrfcdiff.html (side by
side)
AUTH48 diffs:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-auth48diff.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-auth48rfcdiff.html (side
by side)
Comprehensive diffs:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-diff.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-rfcdiff.html (side by
side)
Please review and let us know if any further updates are needed.
Thank you,
RFC Editor/sg
On Feb 19, 2025, at 6:56 AM, Aitken, Paul <pait...@ciena.com> wrote:
Sabrina, there are still some discrepancies between the RFC-to-be and
the registry. I've checked sections 4, 5, and 7 of the RFC-to-be, but
not yet section 6.
Also, RFC9710 is not listed in the "Reference" column for any of the
changes. Whether that's an oversight in the RFC, or an expectation
that IANA will automatically add it; I believe it should be listed
against each modified element.
4.1.2. NEW / sourceTransportPort
4.2.2. NEW / destinationTransportPort
4.4.2. NEW / collectorTransportPort
4.5.2. NEW / exporterTransportPort
The RFC says "See [RFC0768]" while the registry says "See [RFC768]".
262 messageMD5Checksum
"messageScope Information lement" should be "messageScope Information
Element"
285 anonymizationFlags
The text is correct, but the right-hand edge of the table is wonky.
340 informationElementDescription
"with its ownlanguage tag" should be "with its own language tag".
P.
--
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
