Approved T
> On Jan 23, 2025, at 7:06 AM, Sarah Tarrant - starrant at staff.rfc-editor.org > <mailforwa...@cloudmails.net> wrote: > > Hi Tony and Eliot, > > Thank you for your replies. We have updated the document accordingly. > > Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make > changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any further > updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. We will > await final approvals prior to moving forward in the publication process. > > The updated files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9717.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9717.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9717.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9717.xml > > The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9717-diff.html (comprehensive diff) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9717-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes > only) > > Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to view the > most recent version. > > For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9717 > > Thank you, > RFC Editor/st > >> On Jan 22, 2025, at 4:07 PM, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) >> <rfc-...@rfc-editor.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks. Sarah, can you propose appropriate changes? >> Eliot >> ps: Tony, I appreciate your position. Let's have a drink at an appropriate >> time about this one. >>> On 22.01.2025 22:39, Tony Li wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 22, 2025, at 9:24 AM, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) - >>>> rfc-ise at rfc-editor.org <mailforwa...@cloudmails.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> I have one more suggestion for Section 2.3, to address inclusive wording: >>>> s/traditional/typical or typical terrestrial/ >>>> Tony would one of those work for you? >>> >>> >>> I have no problems with real inclusivity issues. >>> >>> However, this is not one of them. Tradition is not an evil word. Changing >>> every instance is simply overkill and unnecessary. Let’s not cancel all of >>> our vocabulary. >>> >>> That said, I’m fine with ’typical’, ’typical terrestrial’ or even ‘legacy’. >>> >>> Tony >>> >>> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
