Hi Tony and Eliot, Thank you for your replies. We have updated the document accordingly.
Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. We will await final approvals prior to moving forward in the publication process. The updated files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9717.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9717.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9717.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9717.xml The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9717-diff.html (comprehensive diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9717-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes only) Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to view the most recent version. For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9717 Thank you, RFC Editor/st > On Jan 22, 2025, at 4:07 PM, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) > <rfc-...@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > Thanks. Sarah, can you propose appropriate changes? > Eliot > ps: Tony, I appreciate your position. Let's have a drink at an appropriate > time about this one. > On 22.01.2025 22:39, Tony Li wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 22, 2025, at 9:24 AM, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) - >>> rfc-ise at rfc-editor.org <mailforwa...@cloudmails.net> wrote: >>> >>> I have one more suggestion for Section 2.3, to address inclusive wording: >>> s/traditional/typical or typical terrestrial/ >>> Tony would one of those work for you? >> >> >> I have no problems with real inclusivity issues. >> >> However, this is not one of them. Tradition is not an evil word. Changing >> every instance is simply overkill and unnecessary. Let’s not cancel all of >> our vocabulary. >> >> That said, I’m fine with ’typical’, ’typical terrestrial’ or even ‘legacy’. >> >> Tony >> >> -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
