> On Jan 22, 2025, at 9:24 AM, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) - > rfc-ise at rfc-editor.org <mailforwa...@cloudmails.net> wrote: > > I have one more suggestion for Section 2.3, to address inclusive wording: > > s/traditional/typical or typical terrestrial/ > > Tony would one of those work for you? >
I have no problems with real inclusivity issues. However, this is not one of them. Tradition is not an evil word. Changing every instance is simply overkill and unnecessary. Let’s not cancel all of our vocabulary. That said, I’m fine with ’typical’, ’typical terrestrial’ or even ‘legacy’. Tony
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
