I like it.
On 21.01.2025 22:17, Tony Li wrote:
On Jan 21, 2025, at 1:00 PM, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot
Lear) - rfc-ise at rfc-editor.org <mailforwa...@cloudmails.net> wrote:
Hi!
All good with what Tony wrote, but perhaps here...
On 21.01.2025 21:37, Tony Li wrote:
The goal of the routing architecture is to provide an organizational
structure to protocols running on the satellite network such that
topology information is conveyed through relevant portions of the
network, paths are computed across the network, data
can be delivered along those paths, and the structure can scale
without any changes to the organizational structure.
That sentence is a mouthful and there's a very minor tense problem.
I think you're being just a bit too terse, but I won't stand on my
head on this. Do you want to take another swing?
Eliot
Ok, less terse:
The goal of the routing architecture is to provide an organizational
structure to protocols running
on the satellite network. This architecture must convey topology
information to relevant portions
of the network. This enables path computation that is used for data
forwarding. The architecture
must also scale without global changes to the organizational structure.
Please feel to massage as you see fit.
Thanks,
T
--
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
