On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:12:45 -0800 Noah Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Erik Steffl wrote:
so while you are pretty much right that alsa is not easy to configure, it's not easy to figure out what is supported for particular cards etc. it's all work in progress. Maybe it's not for you at this time (that's not elitist remark, alsa simply does not provide what you want _at this time_)
I wonder then, why does it have a 1.x version number?
And why it has been incorporated into a stable kernel.
process of maturing?
alsa seems to be fairly stable now so it's time to build it into infrastructure (note that that's what the original poster complained about). and build infrastructure around it (so that it's easier to configure/use etc.)
mature is not the same as stable/usable. as the original poster said - mature are projects like apache, X, linux kernel (not in all areas) etc. - projects that have been around in stable form for years. Alsa is in much earlier phase of development (but not a new kid on the block anymore either)
erik
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
