Matthew Geddes wrote:

On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 15:35, Noah Roberts wrote:



I guess you could say its stable, but it sure doesn't seem very useable to me. I am quite good at getting things to work, even when they don't want to, but nothing I do can make ALSA functional so just how useable is that?



That doesn't necessarily mean that the ALSA source is to blame. There
are plenty of other people who have managed to get it work very nicely
(in many cases, much better than OSS could provide).


Then I find it very interesting that the best answer so far has been to downgrade to 0.9.0rc6 and use the 2.4.x kernel tree. In fact I have seen no other responce to myself or anyone else that has had problems with this driver. In other lists I recieved some ideas, like compiling into the kernel instead of a module, that also did not work for me. Basically it appears that if you have a via 8233/A you are buggered unless those that know how to make it work are for some reason remaining utterly silent while the rest of us struggle and tell each other it can't be done or if you are very lucky it might work for a little while for some magic reason you will never figure out.

The fact that it doesn't work is not upsetting. The fact that it is becomming the new Linux standard and still doesn't work is.


NR


BTW, it isn't very hard to remove the original sender and just send to the list so you don't fill up people's mailboxes with copies.



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Alsa-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user

Reply via email to