Richard Kimber wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:12:45 -0800 Noah Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Erik Steffl wrote:
so while you are pretty much right that alsa is not easy to configure, it's not easy to figure out what is supported for particular cards etc. it's all work in progress. Maybe it's not for you at this time (that's not elitist remark, alsa simply does not provide what you want _at this time_)
I wonder then, why does it have a 1.x version number?
And why it has been incorporated into a stable kernel.
process of maturing?
alsa seems to be fairly stable now
mature is not the same as stable/usable.
I guess you could say its stable, but it sure doesn't seem very useable to me. I am quite good at getting things to work, even when they don't want to, but nothing I do can make ALSA functional so just how useable is that?
NR
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
