I never really looked much at this, but I absolutely agree.

I wanna throw books at people! :D

On 11/4/2017 1:45 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
Yellow Cards & Red Cards should absolutely be switched, no question. Yellow 
Cards are so much stronger.

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu 
<mailto:ke...@u.washington.edu>> wrote:



    So I think:

    - I was thinking of bringing back rests/blots whatever the name,
    - equity suits are a fair-sized hassle, others may disagree,
    - I do not want to lose the current flexibility in judicial assignments,
    random is a pain to manage,
    - the referee is terribly designed, having fixed blots for infraction
    notices would be a big improvement,
    - neutral on the appeals system, both have their plusses/minuses,

    And

    - go back to the November 2002 archives and look up the "orders"
    category of the ruleset (eg judicial orders and sentencing orders
    etc) - there's a process system worth looking at.

    On Fri, 3 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
     > We're not exactly doing anything wrong, but our current system is a
     > bit underdeveloped. Our current system struggles with complex contract
     > lawsuits (why did we feel the need to do what we did with pledges?),
     > and is completely unable to handle civil/equity suits. The referee
     > needs to award all sentences emself (remember what happened when the
     > Referee was inactive for too long?). We're also currently relying on
     > the referee to be practically omni-benevolent. We can challenge a
     > penalty as being wrong, or grossly out of scope, but our current
     > system lacks the nuance of the criminal system in place in 2010.
     > Notice, for instance, the detailed requirements in Rule 1504 for a
     > guilty verdict. Having one person run your criminal system certainly
     > simplifies things, but courts protect due process in a way that is
     > helpful for complex cases. Judicial systems are also less vulnerable
     > to accusations of bias, because judges are semi-randomly chosen (the
     > office of Justiciar prevented against abuse, as did rules about case
     > assignment).  This means not only that there are better feelings all
     > around, but also that players feel more comfortable permitting strong
     > sentences. At certain points we trusted judges enough to allow them to
     > deregister players in extreme cases (not that I'm necessarily
     > advocating for the return of that particular sentence). The appeals
     > system of the time was less heavy handed than the current appeal to
     > the people, allowing an appeals court of three to overturn and correct
     > a verdict, whereas we can only reassign it to a single judge, and we
     > need to go through an entire vote to do that. I'm not sure we should
     > completely do away with an appeal to everyone as a final resort, but
     > it should really be the last resort. Rests provide a useful way of
     > raising funds through expungement fees, while also making sure that
     > punishments are cumulative, rather than instantaneous. Overall, the
     > 2010 judicial system was extensible, nuanced, and fair. It's not
     > exactly that the current system completely lacks those traits, merely
     > that the 2010 system is significantly better in those respects for the
     > current system. Also, the paradigm change sounds fun to me.
     >
     > -Aris
     >
     > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:27 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com 
<mailto:vijar...@gmail.com>> wrote:
     > > I'd like to know what we're currently doing wrong that 2010-Agora was 
doing
     > > right?
     > >
     > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Aris Merchant
     > > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com 
<mailto:thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
     > >>
     > >> I'm getting tired of waiting for others to release judicial reform
     > >> proposals, and am considering writing my own. As a loyal member (am I
     > >> the head?) of the "make Agora 2010 again" party, I suggest reenacting
     > >> the judicial system here [1] . I'd probably simplify it somewhat, in
     > >> particular removing some of the restrictions on CFJ assignment.
     > >> Thoughts?
     > >>
     > >> [1]
     > >> 
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2010-December/008377.html
 
<https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2010-December/008377.html>
     > >> (sorry, I couldn't find it on mail archive)
     > >>
     > >> -Aris
     > >
     > >
     > >
     > >
     > > --
     > > From V.J. Rada
     >




--
 From V.J. Rada

Reply via email to