Also perhaps a bit impractical and unfair? -Aris
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 12:44 AM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > It would be cool if we could decide what is "right" or "wrong" with > justice and crimes with DUELS! > > The accuser vs the accused, in a duel of who can get the best QWOP score > for example, whoever wins is right. > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, 4 Nov 2017, Alex Smith wrote: >> > On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 23:13 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: >> > > > Both Rests and Blots could be destroyed by destroying a matching >> number >> > > > of assets (Notes and Indulgences, respectively). So the modern >> analogue >> > > > would likely be a "negative shiny". >> > > >> > > That's another question. What should the rate be per blot? My guess >> > > would be that somewhere from 2 to 5 shinies would work best. >> > >> > 1, but an offence should be worth a varible number of blots by default. >> > (We used to indicate this via the Class of a Crime. A Note was more >> > valuable than a Shiny is, though, so you'd have to increase the classes >> > if you wanted to keep the punishments at a similar level.) >> >> Do you think we might coordinate to do the multiple currency thing, >> because when we had that we found that the relative value of >> removing blots was very volatile (when fluctuating against the cost >> of a proposal). >> >> >
