We could regulate time with ticks or something if we really wanted to waste weeks slash months slash years drafting the legislature.
And by we I mean y'all, no way in hell I'm doing that. -grok On Sep 12, 2017 7:11 PM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: Very Very Important part of the game. (I am being serious.) ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 12, 2017, at 8:10 PM, Gaelan Steele <gael...@icloud.com> wrote: > > Time passing. > > Gaelan > > On Sep 12, 2017, at 1:25 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What intended interaction with IRL do we have aside from being a person to be a player and Pledges possibly summoning it? >> >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> >> Check out this CFJ: >> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3411 >> >> result: R2125 may need to have better handshakes with external reality >> to handle this sort of thing. >> >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote: >> > How does 869 interact with determining the gamestate exclusively >> > through public fora anyways? The public fora doesn't have record of >> > whether each registered player is a discrete organism capable of >> > freely originating and communicating independent thoughts and ideas, >> > it just assumes that players are following the rules when they >> > register. Before the moment of registration, a person's personness is >> > only calculable outside of public fora. I guess registration is >> > activating a restricted action, which makes me prefer G's possibility >> > to CB's, but I'm honestly a little stumped on that one. >> > >> > also i'm a big fan of "the crime of invisibilating" >> > >> > >> > -grok >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > This whole conversation rung a memory bell for me, something Old (12+ years old) that might be >> > > still in effect! >> > > >> > > There was a Proposal, that read something like the following: >> > > >> > > Be it Hereby Proclaimed that from this moment forward, anyone who causes gamestate >> > > changes without creating a public record is Guilty of the Crime of Invisibilitating. >> > > >> > > Note that Instruments don't lose power (they just reach the end of their effects). So >> > > if a Proposal defines an effect as ongoing, there's still a Powered instrument out there >> > > proclaiming people guilty of this crime whenever they do it... >> > > >> > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> > >> Public messages. You can send a message to all players separately and have it count as public, >> > >> presumably as a defense against fora going down suddenly. >> > >> >> > >> Gaelan >> > >> >> > >> > On Sep 12, 2017, at 8:47 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > The Telepathy problem seems like a puzzle to crack, I'd like to keep on trying: >> > >> > >> > >> > Proto: >> > >> > >> > >> > Title: No Telepathy v2 >> > >> > AI: ? >> > >> > Content: Add to rule (something): >> > >> > >> > >> > "The gamestate is at all times calculable from information posted at the public fora." >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >>
