How does 869 interact with determining the gamestate exclusively through public fora anyways? The public fora doesn't have record of whether each registered player is a discrete organism capable of freely originating and communicating independent thoughts and ideas, it just assumes that players are following the rules when they register. Before the moment of registration, a person's personness is only calculable outside of public fora. I guess registration is activating a restricted action, which makes me prefer G's possibility to CB's, but I'm honestly a little stumped on that one.
also i'm a big fan of "the crime of invisibilating" -grok On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > This whole conversation rung a memory bell for me, something Old (12+ years > old) that might be > still in effect! > > There was a Proposal, that read something like the following: > > Be it Hereby Proclaimed that from this moment forward, anyone who causes > gamestate > changes without creating a public record is Guilty of the Crime of > Invisibilitating. > > Note that Instruments don't lose power (they just reach the end of their > effects). So > if a Proposal defines an effect as ongoing, there's still a Powered > instrument out there > proclaiming people guilty of this crime whenever they do it... > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> Public messages. You can send a message to all players separately and have >> it count as public, >> presumably as a defense against fora going down suddenly. >> >> Gaelan >> >> > On Sep 12, 2017, at 8:47 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > The Telepathy problem seems like a puzzle to crack, I'd like to keep on >> > trying: >> > >> > Proto: >> > >> > Title: No Telepathy v2 >> > AI: ? >> > Content: Add to rule (something): >> > >> > "The gamestate is at all times calculable from information posted at the >> > public fora." >> >
