So if I make a private agreement with someone, it's officially unreasonable
to ding them for any failures to fulfill unless we expose the contract
publicly
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:00 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Well that's one way to forbid punishing anyone for lies or bad intent, if
> nothing
> else.
>
> This is pretty much already what we play by though, in that it can be
> argued
> "if it's not in the PF, it's beyond the reasonable effort of an officer or
> a
> judge to figure it out" so it's thrown out as not being a determinate part
> of
> the game state.
>
> So if you really want to go this route, I'd suggest something like making
> this
> a definition:  "it is beyond a reasonable effort for a recordkeepor or
> judge to
> determine facts about eir records that are not available in public fora"
> or the
> like.  This ties the limitation to calculations affecting Regulated
> Actions and
> not the more amorphous "gamestate".
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > The Telepathy problem seems like a puzzle to crack, I'd like to keep on
> trying:
> >
> > Proto:
> > Title: No Telepathy v2
> > AI: ?
> > Content: Add to rule (something):
> >
> > "The gamestate is at all times calculable from information posted at the
> public fora."
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to