So if I make a private agreement with someone, it's officially unreasonable to ding them for any failures to fulfill unless we expose the contract publicly On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:00 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > Well that's one way to forbid punishing anyone for lies or bad intent, if > nothing > else. > > This is pretty much already what we play by though, in that it can be > argued > "if it's not in the PF, it's beyond the reasonable effort of an officer or > a > judge to figure it out" so it's thrown out as not being a determinate part > of > the game state. > > So if you really want to go this route, I'd suggest something like making > this > a definition: "it is beyond a reasonable effort for a recordkeepor or > judge to > determine facts about eir records that are not available in public fora" > or the > like. This ties the limitation to calculations affecting Regulated > Actions and > not the more amorphous "gamestate". > > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > The Telepathy problem seems like a puzzle to crack, I'd like to keep on > trying: > > > > Proto: > > Title: No Telepathy v2 > > AI: ? > > Content: Add to rule (something): > > > > "The gamestate is at all times calculable from information posted at the > public fora." > > > > > >