I still need to wait for a time limit to expire. On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> the office is vacant, you can deputize at any time. > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > Sure thing all around. Nothing's happening until Wed anyway because > > that's the earliest (I think) that any assessor duty becomes late. > > > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >> >I am still interested, but I would like to note to ais, that I did not > >> >receive his original message to which you are replying. > >> > >> Same. > >> > >> I'm fine to judge if needed, although I strongly disclaim being reassigned > >> 3555. > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > I'm not getting Ais's messages either > >> > > >> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I'm willing to judge, though my current situation makes timeliness a > >> >> consideration, so probably try to give me less time-sensitive CFJs? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 09/11/17 19:13, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > Are Publius, o, Aris, grok, and myself the only ones currently > >> >> > interested > >> >> > in judging - any other volunteers at all?? (and I think grok has > >> >> > stepped > >> >> > down). > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > >> >> >> G. wrote: > >> >> >>> ais523, can you provide the list of "interested judges" you were > >> >> >>> working from for judicial assignments? > >> >> >> Yes, although apparently I have to start a new thread with each > >> >> >> message > >> >> >> (because I can't send messages the normal way, I'm sending this from > >> >> >> a relay > >> >> >> that doesn't store the messages in the usual way once they've been > >> >> >> received, > >> >> >> so there's nothing to reply to; there's a backup of recently relayed > >> >> >> messages but I'm not 100% sure what would happen if I tried replying > >> >> >> to > >> >> >> those). Here are my notes: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Publius 3558 > >> >> >> o 3537*? > >> >> >> Aris 3557 > >> >> >> grok 3555 > >> >> >> G. 3548* 3556 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> First unused number: 3559 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> * means that the CFJ's deadline has been refreshed (e.g. due to a > >> >> >> reassignment or reconsideration). ? means that there's some > >> >> >> uncertainty or > >> >> >> confusion about the status. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> grok has had 1 fewer CFJ assigned than the other judges listed here > >> >> >> (thus needs 1 more CFJ assigned than the others in order to keep > >> >> >> approximate > >> >> >> balance over time. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> ais523 > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> From V.J Rada > >> > > > > > > -- > From V.J Rada >
