On 09/11/17 22:04, VJ Rada wrote:
> the office is vacant, you can deputize at any time.

Am I not assessor?

>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Sure thing all around.  Nothing's happening until Wed anyway because
>> that's the earliest (I think) that any assessor duty becomes late.
>>
>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
>>>> I am still interested, but I would like to note to ais, that I did not 
>>>> receive his original message to which you are replying.
>>> Same.
>>>
>>> I'm fine to judge if needed, although I strongly disclaim being reassigned 
>>> 3555.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm not getting Ais's messages either
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I'm willing to judge, though my current situation makes timeliness a
>>>>> consideration, so probably try to give me less time-sensitive CFJs?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/11/17 19:13, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>>>>> Are Publius, o, Aris, grok, and myself the only ones currently
>>>>>> interested
>>>>>> in judging - any other volunteers at all?? (and I think grok has stepped
>>>>>> down).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
>>>>>>> G. wrote:
>>>>>>>> ais523, can you provide the list of "interested judges" you were
>>>>>>>> working from for judicial assignments?
>>>>>>> Yes, although apparently I have to start a new thread with each message
>>>>>>> (because I can't send messages the normal way, I'm sending this from a 
>>>>>>> relay
>>>>>>> that doesn't store the messages in the usual way once they've been 
>>>>>>> received,
>>>>>>> so there's nothing to reply to; there's a backup of recently relayed
>>>>>>> messages but I'm not 100% sure what would happen if I tried replying to
>>>>>>> those). Here are my notes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Publius 3558
>>>>>>> o 3537*?
>>>>>>> Aris 3557
>>>>>>> grok 3555
>>>>>>> G. 3548* 3556
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First unused number: 3559
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * means that the CFJ's deadline has been refreshed (e.g. due to a
>>>>>>> reassignment or reconsideration). ? means that there's some uncertainty 
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>> confusion about the status.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> grok has had 1 fewer CFJ assigned than the other judges listed here
>>>>>>> (thus needs 1 more CFJ assigned than the others in order to keep 
>>>>>>> approximate
>>>>>>> balance over time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> ais523
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> From V.J Rada
>>>
>
>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to