I'm not getting Ais's messages either On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm willing to judge, though my current situation makes timeliness a > consideration, so probably try to give me less time-sensitive CFJs? > > > On 09/11/17 19:13, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > Are Publius, o, Aris, grok, and myself the only ones currently interested > > in judging - any other volunteers at all?? (and I think grok has stepped > down). > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > >> G. wrote: > >>> ais523, can you provide the list of "interested judges" you were > working from for judicial assignments? > >> Yes, although apparently I have to start a new thread with each message > (because I can't send messages the normal way, I'm sending this from a > relay that doesn't store the messages in the usual way once they've been > received, so there's nothing to reply to; there's a backup of recently > relayed messages but I'm not 100% sure what would happen if I tried > replying to those). Here are my notes: > >> > >> Publius 3558 > >> o 3537*? > >> Aris 3557 > >> grok 3555 > >> G. 3548* 3556 > >> > >> First unused number: 3559 > >> > >> * means that the CFJ's deadline has been refreshed (e.g. due to a > reassignment or reconsideration). ? means that there's some uncertainty or > confusion about the status. > >> > >> grok has had 1 fewer CFJ assigned than the other judges listed here > (thus needs 1 more CFJ assigned than the others in order to keep > approximate balance over time. > >> > >> -- > >> ais523 > >> > > >
