I am still interested, but I would like to note to ais, that I did not receive 
his original message to which you are replying.
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com



> On Sep 11, 2017, at 8:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Are Publius, o, Aris, grok, and myself the only ones currently interested
> in judging - any other volunteers at all?? (and I think grok has stepped 
> down).
> 
> 
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
>> G. wrote:
>>> ais523, can you provide the list of "interested judges" you were working 
>>> from for judicial assignments?
>> 
>> Yes, although apparently I have to start a new thread with each message 
>> (because I can't send messages the normal way, I'm sending this from a relay 
>> that doesn't store the messages in the usual way once they've been received, 
>> so there's nothing to reply to; there's a backup of recently relayed 
>> messages but I'm not 100% sure what would happen if I tried replying to 
>> those). Here are my notes:
>> 
>> Publius 3558
>> o 3537*?
>> Aris 3557
>> grok 3555
>> G. 3548* 3556
>> 
>> First unused number: 3559
>> 
>> * means that the CFJ's deadline has been refreshed (e.g. due to a 
>> reassignment or reconsideration). ? means that there's some uncertainty or 
>> confusion about the status.
>> 
>> grok has had 1 fewer CFJ assigned than the other judges listed here (thus 
>> needs 1 more CFJ assigned than the others in order to keep approximate 
>> balance over time.
>> 
>> --
>> ais523
>> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to