Sure thing all around.  Nothing's happening until Wed anyway because
that's the earliest (I think) that any assessor duty becomes late.

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> >I am still interested, but I would like to note to ais, that I did not 
> >receive his original message to which you are replying.
> 
> Same.
> 
> I'm fine to judge if needed, although I strongly disclaim being reassigned 
> 3555.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm not getting Ais's messages either
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm willing to judge, though my current situation makes timeliness a
> >> consideration, so probably try to give me less time-sensitive CFJs?
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/11/17 19:13, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Are Publius, o, Aris, grok, and myself the only ones currently
> >> > interested
> >> > in judging - any other volunteers at all?? (and I think grok has stepped
> >> > down).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> >> >> G. wrote:
> >> >>> ais523, can you provide the list of "interested judges" you were
> >> >>> working from for judicial assignments?
> >> >> Yes, although apparently I have to start a new thread with each message
> >> >> (because I can't send messages the normal way, I'm sending this from a 
> >> >> relay
> >> >> that doesn't store the messages in the usual way once they've been 
> >> >> received,
> >> >> so there's nothing to reply to; there's a backup of recently relayed
> >> >> messages but I'm not 100% sure what would happen if I tried replying to
> >> >> those). Here are my notes:
> >> >>
> >> >> Publius 3558
> >> >> o 3537*?
> >> >> Aris 3557
> >> >> grok 3555
> >> >> G. 3548* 3556
> >> >>
> >> >> First unused number: 3559
> >> >>
> >> >> * means that the CFJ's deadline has been refreshed (e.g. due to a
> >> >> reassignment or reconsideration). ? means that there's some uncertainty 
> >> >> or
> >> >> confusion about the status.
> >> >>
> >> >> grok has had 1 fewer CFJ assigned than the other judges listed here
> >> >> (thus needs 1 more CFJ assigned than the others in order to keep 
> >> >> approximate
> >> >> balance over time.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> ais523
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> From V.J Rada
>

Reply via email to