i thought he meant arbitor bc we were discussing cfjs. yup, you are the assessor.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 09/11/17 22:04, VJ Rada wrote: >> the office is vacant, you can deputize at any time. > > Am I not assessor? > >> >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>> >>> Sure thing all around. Nothing's happening until Wed anyway because >>> that's the earliest (I think) that any assessor duty becomes late. >>> >>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >>>>> I am still interested, but I would like to note to ais, that I did not >>>>> receive his original message to which you are replying. >>>> Same. >>>> >>>> I'm fine to judge if needed, although I strongly disclaim being reassigned >>>> 3555. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> I'm not getting Ais's messages either >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> I'm willing to judge, though my current situation makes timeliness a >>>>>> consideration, so probably try to give me less time-sensitive CFJs? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 09/11/17 19:13, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>>>>>> Are Publius, o, Aris, grok, and myself the only ones currently >>>>>>> interested >>>>>>> in judging - any other volunteers at all?? (and I think grok has stepped >>>>>>> down). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote: >>>>>>>> G. wrote: >>>>>>>>> ais523, can you provide the list of "interested judges" you were >>>>>>>>> working from for judicial assignments? >>>>>>>> Yes, although apparently I have to start a new thread with each message >>>>>>>> (because I can't send messages the normal way, I'm sending this from a >>>>>>>> relay >>>>>>>> that doesn't store the messages in the usual way once they've been >>>>>>>> received, >>>>>>>> so there's nothing to reply to; there's a backup of recently relayed >>>>>>>> messages but I'm not 100% sure what would happen if I tried replying to >>>>>>>> those). Here are my notes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Publius 3558 >>>>>>>> o 3537*? >>>>>>>> Aris 3557 >>>>>>>> grok 3555 >>>>>>>> G. 3548* 3556 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> First unused number: 3559 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * means that the CFJ's deadline has been refreshed (e.g. due to a >>>>>>>> reassignment or reconsideration). ? means that there's some >>>>>>>> uncertainty or >>>>>>>> confusion about the status. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> grok has had 1 fewer CFJ assigned than the other judges listed here >>>>>>>> (thus needs 1 more CFJ assigned than the others in order to keep >>>>>>>> approximate >>>>>>>> balance over time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> ais523 >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> From V.J Rada >>>> >> >> > > -- >From V.J Rada
