On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:29 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > All sorts of titles for omd (in caller's arguments): > > > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3422 > > I've just noticed that the gratuitous arguments by me in CFJ 3422 have, > in the Court record, an additional line labelling them as being by you > (thus they're incorrectly attributed to two different people); it looks > rather like I submitted the fact that you made those arguments as > evidence. If I remember correctly (but it was a few years ago now so > maybe I don't), they were in fact written by me, and I quoted your > signature (and the quote of your signature has somehow become garbled > in the Court record).
Yep, you quoted me, and it was a cut/paste error. Fixed now (in both 3421 and 3422). Here's how it looked in your email: On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 12:00 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > CFJ: omd is known as offense most dire. I bar Henri > CFJ: omd is known as oddly marked derriere. I bar Henri Gratuitous arguments: Many players seem to be interpreting the signature rule as allowing a particular signature /pattern/. For instance, omd signs eir messages using words that start with "o", "m", and "d"; [...]
