The other assignable ones are sproklems CFJ on whether or not I barred ais in a previous CFJ. And Gael an has 2 linked ones outstanding
On Wednesday, June 28, 2017, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, PSS made the motion. However, a recent CFJ explicitly ruled that this > case could be reassigned. O was the judge. Youre good. > > On Wednesday, June 28, 2017, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ke...@u.washington.edu');>> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: >> > On Sat, 2017-06-10 at 13:48 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> > > First, CuddleBeam clearly delivered a judgement in 3509, then filed a >> > > Motion to Reconsider it. That first part worked fine. >> > >> > Can someone point me to the Motion to Reconsider? Looking back through >> > the lists, I've found two attempts to resolve one and no intent. >> > Obviously, if the CFJ wasn't Reconsidered, I can't reassign it. >> >> Ok, re-reading everything I can find, I agree, there's nothing I can find >> actually worded as an Intent (and CuddleBeam supported a supposed intent >> but didn't actually file). I must have misread something when I posted >> the above. Sorry about the confusion. >> >> > (Sorry for not catching up on this earlier. I've been short on time, >> > especially for Agora, and handling tardy judges and >> > recusals/reassignments/reconsiderations is much more timeconsuming than >> > the initial assignment, in addition to not currently having a rules- >> > mandated deadline, so I keep postponing it.) >> >> I intended to do a weekly update to the archives including a "these >> judgements >> are late" informational post, but I, too, have fallen behind in the time- >> consuming stuff these past couple weeks. Sorry. >> >> >>
