On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:32 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > SnuggleWand could've indeed - the CFJ is indeed in a peculiar mess, > which is > > > why I recently introduced recusal, so if someone gets a case they just > don't > > > wanna deal with (which happened to PuddleGleam here) then ey can recuse > > > themselves instead of holding up the judicial system. > > > > > > V.J. - It might be good to Point a Finger at TheBeaminator for eir > pledge > > > breaking, as that would serve em right for breaking a pledge (I could > > > obviously do it too, but i'm having too much fun coming up with new > > > nick-names for Old Beam Boy (or Girl)) > > > > Now come on, be reasonable. Whatever mistakes Cuddlebeam may have > > made, e is a new player. E is therefore entitled to a chance to figure > > out the game. If you want to point a finger at em, that's your right, > > but you can stop making fun of the person. There has to be a better > > solution than that. Maybe someone could mentor em? > > It's an old tradition to blow off steam: > > Calling someone a pineapple (due to genuine annoyance): > > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?1613 > > All sorts of titles for omd (in caller's arguments): > > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3422 > > Name-calling got so bad at one point, someone tried to mousetrap people > via insults: > > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?1290 > > (we generally draw the line at outright insults, though in that last case > the line was crossed repeatedly). I was just scheming a system (like via organization) that rewards players for unambiguously referring to players by not their official nick name.
