This message is just for the convenience of those not caught up, as I was not.
Oh dear God just read the full mess. CB (this is a valid nickname, don't even think about it) submitted a message *pledging* not to submit judgement. Gaelan then attempted to ratify a document stating that 3509 was judgeless, which was objected to by o. The player also known as CuddleBeam who I shall now refer to as UberJeff submitted a clearly incorrect Judgement of DISMISS, based on the fact that he couldn't be bothered to read the rules. Your message states that UberJeff moved for reconsideration, but actually Publius moved for it, which UberJeff supported. UberJeff then went back to eir original stance of not submitting one. It is clear that UberJeff broke eir pledge not to judge the judgement. It is also clear that, as UberJeff emself admits, their original judgement is clearly wrong. UberJeff should be carded, the initial judgement should be counted as authoritative, weshould moot that judgement and give the CFJ to a different judge. On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:41 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it legal to move for you to reconsider your own judgement and then not > judge it? I feel like this should be counted as a refusal to reconsider and > we should thus count the original judgement (and Moot it if necessary). > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:47 AM, CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm not going to give Judgement on that, because while I am honestly able >> to give Judgement (and would Judge TRUE, because I agree with Gaelan), I >> won't engage in tit for tat and cards for cards because I believe it's >> wrong, even if our Justice system commands me to. >> > >
