C-walker wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:27 PM, G. wrote: >> 6. �Some punishments can move you down ranks (but rests still >> � �exist, otherwise people on bottom of list can break rules >> � �with impunity). > > Why not just allow lower places on the list than there are players? > After a certain point, (being P places below N) the ordinary voting > limit of the player should become 0. > > Allowing 'empty places' on the list could make things more > interesting: maybe players could automatically rise to the top of > pockets of empty places in the list?
Alternatively, have fake players on the list with names like Threshhold of Allowed to Vote. Then the size of the list would be N+K, where N is the number of players and K is the number of fake players.
