On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:32 PM, G. wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, C-walker wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:27 PM, G. wrote: >>> 3. Some form of monthly rotation. >> >> Again, this is not much different from the current system. Have you >> any specific ideas for a different form of monthly rotation? > > Sorry, I should have elaborated this. The main purpose for regular > rotation is to retire the Speaker (perhaps down towards the bottom > but certainly not all the way to the bottom). It's my idea that > the balance will be such that almost all changes occur through cards > (as played by choice) and wins. The 'rotation' will shuffle out the > speaker, but won't have that elaborate 'everyone up, everyone down' > controlled by an officer. A "complete reordering" of the list might > come about through making the coup mechanic (the Admiral of the Navy > is awaiting orders). > > Does that make it sound different enough?
Yes, and I support the removal of the 'everyone up, everyone down' system to. -- C-walker
