On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote: >> On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 11:32 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> The only risk I see is that reducing quorum when the number of active >>> players stays high ups the conspiracy attempt: in the words of a past >>> wise agoran, "quorum describes the minimum size for a legislative >>> conspiracy." >> >> Which, given the existence of a relevant MWoP, is 3. > > Hence the existence of "making a proposal Democratic" (not that timing > isn't everything here). -G.
(And you'd need to include both the Rubberstamper and the wielder of the veto in the 3). It's actually been a long time since we've had a proposal that people on both sides have used the various procedural tricks to make the process interesting in a gameplay sense. Maybe we should try Takeover Proposals again. -G.
