On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So can we please examine this appeal on its merits? > It has none. For gods sake you confessed to the crime and the judgement > was trivial on facts. To say that your "already tried" scam is > "interesting" in any sense is sheer sophistry. How can an appeals court > be so gutless or corrupt as to do *anything* but affirm?
I think it is interesting. If you want a punishment so badly, call another criminal case or hold your peace.
