On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Back in CFJ 1346, several players made a comments such as "if the appeals > court can be corrupted and deliver blatantly illegal judgements, we're no > longer playing Agora or have faith that we can respect a body of rules, and > we might as well quit." Back then, several players really meant that. > Thankfully, the appeals court at the time was an honorable one. A body of > law is only as good as its defenders: Is the game currently so bankrupt > as this?
Heh, thanks for the Favor, ais523... Goethe, you're making a mountain out of a molehill. REMAND is a legal judgement, but if you want to punish me for the scam, call a criminal case against me for a different rule violation -- in fact, I've agreed to a contract that you could use to have me support the initiation. There are lots: I was hoping to absolve myself and ehird of criminal blame by fiat (which, I think at least, is a reasonable consequence of a dictatorship scam). For example, you could criminal-CFJ me for violating the P99 contract by causing P99 to register with the same basis as another player. So can we please examine this appeal on its merits?
