On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:33, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 22:39 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2273a >> >> ============================ Appeal 2273a ============================ > I spend a Favour to call in a Favour on CFJ 2273, specifying ALREADY > TRIED. I note that there are two appropriate verdicts for this appeal, > AFFIRM and REMAND, and am using the Protection Racket to persuade the > Dons to choose a particular option in it. > > I intend, with support from two of {BobTHJ, Warrigal, the CotC}, to send > the following message on behalf of the judicial panel in CFJ 2273a: > > {{{ > There is serious doubt about the appropriateness of the original > judgement, as it has since become inappropriate; therefore, this panel > REMANDS the question on culpability in CFJ 2273, so that the judge can > issue an appropriate judgment. > }}}
I support. BobTHJ
