Warrigal wrote: > I see one way this panel can avoid breaking any rules. With the > support of two of BobTHJ, ais523, and H. CotC Murphy, I intend to send > the following message on behalf of judge of CFJ 2273a: "This panel > recuses itself from CFJ 2273a." BobTHJ and ais523, please support; it > will only speed things up.
You could also intend to make it judge AFFIRM. BobTHJ is (I assume) prohibited from supporting by the Protection Racket, but you and ais523 aren't.
