On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I intend to appeal this with 2 support. Increasing a player's voting >> limit on a decision causes it to be higher than it otherwise would have >> been. Eir voting limit was 1, increased by 50 (or however many it was, I >> can't remember offhand). > > R2156 says "the voting limit is" not "the voting limit defaults to" or > "begins at, subject to modification"
There was a lot of discussion back and forth in a-d about this -- precedence rules, preferable for rules to mean something, etc. The judgement as written fails to properly address the full complexity of the issue.
